 |
Fatwa Khomeini Imam Syiah | Beliau mati Dalam Keadaan Mayat Terjatuh 3 Kali Dan Auratnya Terbuka ( Gambar ) |
Beliau mati Dalam Keadaan Mayat Terjatuh 3 Kali Dan Auratnya Terbuka
Fatwa Khomeini:
"Barangsiapa yang meninggal lalu jenazahnya jatuh dari keranda jenazah maka dia termasuk dari penduduk neraka".
Dalam fatwa yang lain pula Khomeini mengatakan;
"Salah satu dari tanda-tanda su'ul khatimah adalah jatuh dari keranda jenazah saat akan dikuburkan".
Dan lihatlah apa yang telah berlaku ke atas jenazah khomeini, saat dia akan dikuburkan jenazah khomeini tiga kali terjatuh dari keranda dan auratnya terbuka.
"Katakanlah, 'Wahai Tuhan Yang mempunyai kerajaan, Engkau berikan kerajaan kepada orang yang Engkau kehendaki dan Engkau cabut kerajaan dari orang yang Engkau kehendaki. Engkau muliakan orang yang Engkau kehendaki dan Engkau hinakan orang yang Engkau kehendaki, Di tangan Engkaulah segala kebajikan. Sesungguhnya Engkau Mahakuasa atas segala sesuatu." Ali Imran(26)
"Katakanlah, 'Wahai Tuhan Yang mempunyai kerajaan, Engkau berikan kerajaan kepada orang yang Engkau kehendaki dan Engkau cabut kerajaan dari orang yang Engkau kehendaki. Engkau muliakan orang yang Engkau kehendaki dan Engkau hinakan orang yang Engkau kehendaki, Di tangan Engkaulah segala kebajikan. Sesungguhnya Engkau Mahakuasa atas segala sesuatu." Ali Imran(26)
 |
Gerakan Menyedarkan Syi’ah Semoga Kembali Kepada Jalan Yang Lurus
Iran merupakan negara yang dahulunya dikenali dengan nama Parsi/Persia. Parsi merupakan sebuah kerajaan yang besar dimana mayoritas penduduknya menganut agama Majusi (penyembah api, atau lebih dikenal sebagai Zoroasterisme). Kehidupan mereka mewah dengan harta benda, kerana memang kota-kota di Parsi indah dan subur, serta peradabannya cukup maju pada masa itu.
Dan di antara rencana itu adalah dengan pembunuhan Umar Al-Khattab radhiallahu ‘anhu, Khalifah Islam yang telah meruntuhkan kerajaan Majusi Kaisar Parsi. Itulah mengapa Syi'ah benar-benar benci kepada Umar Al-Khattab radhiallahu ‘anhu. Kebencian yang amat sangat itu bisa dilihat dengan pengagungan Abu Lu’luah (pembunuh Khalifah Umar) dengan gelar ‘Bapak Pembela Agama’.
Di sini terjawablah sudah mengapa Syi'ah berpusat di Iran. Syi'ah adalah agama yang ‘dilahirkan’ untuk membalas dendam kekalahan Kaisar Parsi terhadap Islam. Syi'ah adalah simbol hasad dan kemarahan kaum Parsi kepada bangsa Arab umumnya dan kaum Muslimin khususnya. [sumber:Hazis]
Kenapa SYI'AH Berpusat Di IRAN..?
Seperti yang kita ketahui, Iran adalah salah satu Negara Syi'ah terbesar di dunia. Iran terkenal dengan sejarahnya yaitu ‘Revolusi (Islam) Iran’ yang dipimpin oleh Ayatullah Khomeini, seorang pemimpin besar Syi'ah.
MuslimNetizen.com
Namun, pernahkah kita bertanya, “Mengapa Syi'ah itu berpusat di Iran dan tidak di Negara lain..?!”
Iran merupakan negara yang dahulunya dikenali dengan nama Parsi/Persia. Parsi merupakan sebuah kerajaan yang besar dimana mayoritas penduduknya menganut agama Majusi (penyembah api, atau lebih dikenal sebagai Zoroasterisme). Kehidupan mereka mewah dengan harta benda, kerana memang kota-kota di Parsi indah dan subur, serta peradabannya cukup maju pada masa itu.
MuslimNetizen.com
Pada abad ke-7 Masehi, ketika cahaya Islam baru saja menjadi satu kekuatan besar dalam percaturan kekuasaan di dunia, Islam tampil sebagai ‘rising star’ di bawah pimpinan Umar Al-Khattab radhiallahu ‘anhu. Ketika itu, Umar -ra mengembangkan wilayah Islam hingga ke Parsi, dimana pada ketika itu Parsi bernama Sassania.
Pada abad ke-7 Masehi, ketika cahaya Islam baru saja menjadi satu kekuatan besar dalam percaturan kekuasaan di dunia, Islam tampil sebagai ‘rising star’ di bawah pimpinan Umar Al-Khattab radhiallahu ‘anhu. Ketika itu, Umar -ra mengembangkan wilayah Islam hingga ke Parsi, dimana pada ketika itu Parsi bernama Sassania.
MuslimNetizen.com
Pertempuran
tentara Islam melawan tentara Parsi yang dikenal dengan nama peperangan
Qadisiyah, di antaranya Saad bin Abi Waqqash melawan panglima Parsi,
Rustum. Parsi akhirnya kalah. Peperangan demi peperangan melemahkan lagi
kerajaan Parsi sekaligus menenggelamkan Kaisar Parsi ke ambang
kehancuran. Akhirnya kerajaam Parsi benar-benar runtuh dalam Perang
Madain pada tahun 651 Masehi.
MuslimNetizen.com
Pada ketika itu, banyak kaum Majusi yang berpura-pura memeluk agama Islam. Niat mereka hanyalah satu : untuk menghancurkan Islam dari dalam. Mereka menyusun rencana demi meruntuhkan kekuasaan kaum Muslimin dengan cara menyelewengkan ajaran Islam dengan mencampur adukkan aqidah Majusi dan Yahudi.
Pada ketika itu, banyak kaum Majusi yang berpura-pura memeluk agama Islam. Niat mereka hanyalah satu : untuk menghancurkan Islam dari dalam. Mereka menyusun rencana demi meruntuhkan kekuasaan kaum Muslimin dengan cara menyelewengkan ajaran Islam dengan mencampur adukkan aqidah Majusi dan Yahudi.
Dan di antara rencana itu adalah dengan pembunuhan Umar Al-Khattab radhiallahu ‘anhu, Khalifah Islam yang telah meruntuhkan kerajaan Majusi Kaisar Parsi. Itulah mengapa Syi'ah benar-benar benci kepada Umar Al-Khattab radhiallahu ‘anhu. Kebencian yang amat sangat itu bisa dilihat dengan pengagungan Abu Lu’luah (pembunuh Khalifah Umar) dengan gelar ‘Bapak Pembela Agama’.
MuslimNetizen.com
Sementara salah seorang Puteri Kaisar terakhir mereka, yaitu Yazdegerd III telah menjadi tawanan kaum Muslimin sejurus setelah kejatuhan Kaisar Parsi. Puteri Kaisar itu akhirnya dinikahkan dengan Hussein bin Ali bin Abi Thalib radhiallahu ‘anhu. Maka, karena ini jugalah mereka begitu fanatik dan cenderung ‘mendewakan’ Hussein bin Ali radhiallahu ‘anhu. Hussein -ra memiliki keturunan dari puteri Sassania yang mereka anggap sebagai keramat.
MuslimNetizen.comSementara salah seorang Puteri Kaisar terakhir mereka, yaitu Yazdegerd III telah menjadi tawanan kaum Muslimin sejurus setelah kejatuhan Kaisar Parsi. Puteri Kaisar itu akhirnya dinikahkan dengan Hussein bin Ali bin Abi Thalib radhiallahu ‘anhu. Maka, karena ini jugalah mereka begitu fanatik dan cenderung ‘mendewakan’ Hussein bin Ali radhiallahu ‘anhu. Hussein -ra memiliki keturunan dari puteri Sassania yang mereka anggap sebagai keramat.
Di sini terjawablah sudah mengapa Syi'ah berpusat di Iran. Syi'ah adalah agama yang ‘dilahirkan’ untuk membalas dendam kekalahan Kaisar Parsi terhadap Islam. Syi'ah adalah simbol hasad dan kemarahan kaum Parsi kepada bangsa Arab umumnya dan kaum Muslimin khususnya. [sumber:Hazis]
Adakah Iran Negara Islam?
Masih Percayakah Anda Bahwa Iran Adalah Negara Islam?
Waspada tipuan Syiah Iran, Khomeini ternyata beragama Sikh(Syi’ah)
Banyak kalangan percaya bahwa Khomeini seorang Ahlul Bait. “Jangan percayai itu. Dia merupakan orang asli India keturunan kaum beragama Sikh.” Demikian tegas Ustadz Muhammad Abdurrahman Al Amiry pada situs resminya,alamiry.net, Senin (20/4/2015).
Anda penasaran? Mari kita singkap tabir hakikat Khomeini sebenarnya. Apa asal agamanya? Hal apa lagi yang belum diketahui Muslimin tentangnya?
Khomeini Dari Keluarga Sikh..........
Ayah Khomeini berasal dari selatan negara India yang menganut agama sikh dan ibunya adalah anak dari seorang imam di tempat peribadatan agama sikh di Kasmir.
Apa sikhisme itu? Sikhisme (bahasa Punjabi: ਸਿੱਖੀ) adalah salah satu agama besar di dunia yang bertolak belakang dengan islam. Agama ini berkembang terutamanya pada abad ke-16 dan 17 di India. Kata Sikhisme berasal dari kata Sikh, yang berarti “murid” atau “pelajar”.
Selebihnya bisa melihatnya disini. Dan tentunya, kita tidak sembarang ucap, bahwa dia asalnya dari kaum penganut agama sikh di India. Itu diakui sendiri oleh Ulama syi’ah Musa Al-Musawi. Dia mengatakan pada kitabnya Al-Jumhuriyyah Ats-Tsaniyah:
حيث قدم جده من الهند قبل 120سنة وسكن قرية خمين في إيران. ووالده هو مصطفي ابن احمد وكان يدعى سينكا، ولد سنة 1842 في كشمير من أسرة سيخية ثرية وكان والد سينكا تاجر خمر وعلى علاقة ودية بالإنجليز ،ولما تعرف على فتاة مسلمة تدعى طاهرة وهي ابنة أحد التجار المسلمين قرر اعتناق الدين الإسلامي للزواج منها فهدده أهله بالقتل ففر مع طاهرة من كشمير إلى مدينة لكفؤ ،وأسلم سينكا على يد سيد حامد حسين مؤلف كتاب عبقات الأنوار.وحفيد عم الخميني يسمى ودا ويعيش بالقرب من مدينة سريناجار عاصمة كشمير ،وهو مسؤول عن معابد السيخ هناك . وهذه المعلومات استقاها المؤلف من علماء الشـيعة في كشمير
“Kakek Khomaeni datang dari India sebelum 120 tahun yang lalu. Dan dia tinggal di kota Khumain di Iran. Dan ayahnya adalah Musthafa bin Ahmad dan dikenal sebagai “Singh” lahir tahun 1842 di Kashmir dari keluarga penganut agama sikh. Dan ayah Singh adalah penjual Khamr dan memiliki hubungan hangat dengan Inggris.
Setelah dia mengenal seorang wanita muslimah yang bernama Thahirah dan dia adalah anak dari pedagang muslimin, maka dia menetapkan untuk memeluk agama islam agar dapat menikah dengan wanita tersebut. Maka keluarganya mengancam untuk membunuhnya. Maka dia kabur bersama Thahirah dari Kashmir ke kota lokfo. Dan Singh masuk islam di tangan Sayyid Hamid Husain penulis Kitab ‘Aqabat Al-Anwar. Dan cucu dari pamannya Khomaeni bernama Wud dan dia tinggal di dekat kota Srinagar ibu Kota Kashmir dan dia penanggung jawab tempat-tempat peribadatan Sikh disana. Dan inilah info-info yang dikumpulkan oleh penulis dari ulama-ulama syi’ah di Kashmir” (Al-Jumhuriyyah Ats-Tsaniyah hal. 352).
Pernyataan di atas adalah kesaksian ulama syi’ah sendiri. Oleh karena itu, Khomaeni bukan Ahlul Bait, Karena Ahlul Bait adalah keturunan nabi yang benar-benar berpegang teguh dengan agama islam dan bukan keturunan dari keluarga penganut agama sikh. Bukti lain bahwa Khomaeni berasal dari India juga dapat diperhatikan pada foto di bawah ini.
Khomaeni bersama ayah yang beragama sikh
 |
| Khomaeni bersama ayah yang beragama sikh |
Keterangan foto menggunakan bahasa Persia. Makna inti dari foto itu: “Gambar Khomaeni di masa kecilnya sedang digendong oleh ayahnya. Diambil dari kitab “Malik Kiyan” karangan Dr. Humaid Khowajah Nushairi. Kitab mereka sendiri yang bersaksi dan gambarnya jelas.
Dan ternyata, Khomaeni sendiri mengakui bahwa dia adalah seorang India. Dan ini banyak yang tidak diketahui oleh kaum Muslimin. Dia berkata sendiri dalam kitabnya Syarh Du’a Sihr bahwa dia adalah orang India. Dia menamai dirinya dengan “As-Sayyid Ruhullah bin Musthafa Al-Khomaeni Al-Hindi”. Al-Hindi adalah berasal dari India.
Lihat pengakuan dia sendiri disini:
 |
| pengakuan keindiaan Khomaeni diblock kuning |
Pengakuan keindiaan Khomaeni diblock yang dikuningkan
Begitulah Khomaeni yang bukan Ahlul Bait. Pada awal hidupnya dia menulis risalah dan kitab dengan namanya Hindi (asal India). Kemudian tiba-tiba berubah menjadi Musawi dan kemudian memakai kain penutup kepala warna hitam.
Akan tetapi saudaranya Khomaeni enggan untuk mengubah nasab keluarganya dari Singh menjadi Musawi. Dan dia juga enggan untuk memakai kain penutup kepala hitam. Akhirnya, Khomaeni mengurungnya hingga membunuh saudaranya.
Maka orang pertama asal India dari kaum penganut agama sikh yang menguasai Iran dan memperbudak orang syi’ah dan memut’ah wanita-wanita syi’ah sekehendak perutnya adalah Khomaeni.
Maka bagaimana dia dipastikan sebagai Ahlul Bait, sedangkan nasabnya saja masih sangat diragukan.
Dan Khomaeni, meletakkan simbol khas agama nenek moyangnya “sikh” sebagai simbol negara Iran. Maka sangat mirip simbol bendera Iran dan simbol bendera kaum agama sikh.
Maka, begitukah Ahlul Bait?? Memiliki kesamaan dengan agama sikh?? Kalla wa haasya. Mengapa dunia Arab dan Parsi begitu mudah tertipu oleh Khomaeni?.
Sekali lagi, nasabnya sangat diragukan. Bahkan ada versi lain yang menyatakan dia adalah keturunan Inggris walau India adalah tempat tinggalnya. Ayahnya bernama William Richard Williampshon. Dia lahir di kota Bristol dan ibunya seorang India Kashmir.
Berita ini diambil dari salah satu kabar media dari India yang telah dikabarkan pada tahun 80-an. Maka, bagaimana Khomaeni dapat dipastikan sebagai Ahlul Bait keuturnan Nabi, sedangkan nasabnya sajatidak diakui oleh ulama syi’ah dan yang lainnya?
Dengan demikian, mengutip Abu Muntashir Al-Balusy, Pengisi Kajian Al Amiry mengatakan bahwa,
ان الخميني لا ينتسب الى سلسلة نسب معروفة
“Sesungguhnya Khomaeni tidak bernasab kepada silsilah nasab yang dikenal”.
Fakta; Khomeini Bukanlah Ahlul Bait, Namun Keturunan India Beragama Sikh
Ayah Khomeini berasal dari selatan negara India yang menganut agama sikh dan ibunya adalah anak dari seorang imam di tempat peribadatan agama sikh di Kasmir.
Apa sikhisme itu? Sikhisme (bahasa Punjabi: ਸਿੱਖੀ) adalah salah satu agama besar di dunia yang bertolak belakang dengan islam. Agama ini berkembang terutamanya pada abad ke-16 dan 17 di India. Kata Sikhisme berasal dari kata Sikh, yang berarti “murid” atau “pelajar”. Selebihnya bisa melihatnya disini
Maka keluarganya mengancam untuk
membunuhnya. Maka dia kabur bersama Thahirah dari Kashmir ke kota lokfo.
Dan Singh masuk islam di tangan Sayyid Hamid Husain penulis Kitab
‘Aqabat Al-Anwar. Dan cucu dari pamannya Khomaeni bernama Wud dan dia
tinggal di dekat kota Srinagar ibu Kota Kashmir dan dia penanggung jawab
tempat-tempat peribadatan Sikh disana. Dan inilah info-info yang
dikumpulkan oleh penulis dari ulama-ulama syi’ah di Kashmir”
(Al-Jumhuriyyah Ats-Tsaniyah hal. 352)
Pernyataan di atas adalah kesaksian ulama syi’ah sendiri. Oleh karena itu, Khomaeni bukan Ahlul Bait, Karena Ahlul Bait adalah keturunan nabi yang benar-benar berpegang teguh dengan agama islam dan bukan keturunan dari keluarga penganut agama sikh.
Dan ternyata, Khomaeni sendiri mengakui bahwa dia adalah seorang India. Dan ini banyak yang tidak diketahui oleh kaum Muslimin.
Pernyataan di atas adalah kesaksian ulama syi’ah sendiri. Oleh karena itu, Khomaeni bukan Ahlul Bait, Karena Ahlul Bait adalah keturunan nabi yang benar-benar berpegang teguh dengan agama islam dan bukan keturunan dari keluarga penganut agama sikh.
Akan tetapi saudaranya Khomaeni enggan untuk mengubah nasab keluarganya dari Singh menjadi Musawi. Dan dia juga enggan untuk memakai kain penutup kepala hitam. Akhirnya, Khomaeni mengurungnya hingga membunuh saudaranya.
Maka orang pertama asal India dari kaum penganut agama sikh yang menguasai Iran dan memperbudak orang syi’ah dan memut’ah wanita-wanita syi’ah sekehendak perutnya adalah Khomaeni. Maka bagaimana dia dipastikan sebagai Ahlul Bait, sedangkan nasabnya saja masih sangat diragukan.
Dan Khomaeni, meletakkan simbol khas agama nenek moyangnya “sikh” sebagai simbol negara Iran. Maka sangat mirip simbol bendera Iran dan simbol bendera kaum agama sikh.
 |
| kiri simbol pada bendera Iran, kanan simbol agung agama sikh |
 |
| bendera agama sikh |
 |
| bendera Iran |
Maka, begitukah Ahlul Bait?? Memiliki kesamaan dengan agama sikh?? Kalla wa haasya. Bodohlah orang yang bodoh tertipu oleh Khomaeni.
Sekali lagi, nasabnya sangat diragukan. Bahkan ada versi lain yang menyatakan dia adalah keturunan Inggris walau India adalah tempat tinggalnya. Ayahnya bernama William Richard Williampshon. Dia lahir di kota Bristol dan ibunya seorang India Kashmir.
Berita ini diambil dari salah satu kabar media dari India yang telah dikabarkan pada tahun 80-an.
Dan selebihnya bisa dilihat disini.
Maka, bagaimana Khomaeni dapat dipastikan sebagai Ahlul Bait keuturnan Nabi, sedangkan nasabnya sajatidak diakui oleh ulama syi’ah dan yang lainnya?
Dengan demikian, mengutip Abu Muntashir Al-Balusy, Pengisi Kajian Al Amiry mengatakan bahwa,
ان الخميني لا ينتسب الى سلسلة نسب معروفة
“Sesungguhnya Khomaeni tidak bernasab kepada silsilah nasab yang dikenal".
(adibahasan/ararrahmah.com/syiahindonesia.com)
Ayatollah Khomeini the British MI-6 Agent/Puppet
 |
| By looking at his photo without a beard, you will notice that he indeed looks British |
Khomeini's Background & His British Father
With all bets off, the Iranian reformers have now struck at the heart
of the revolution and are insisting on an inquiry into the
disappearance of Imam (Ayatollah) Musa Sadr, some 25-years ago, during a
visit to Libya. The Iranian-born leader of the Lebanese Shia, Imam
Musa Sadr, was revered and respected above all others in the Shia
world. He refused to accept Khomeini as an Ayatollah. With the
influence Imam Musa Sadr enjoyed, he became an insurmountable obstacle
to Khomeini’s political plans, and of those who supported the overthrow
of the Shah and needed a despot like Khomeini to be their cat’s paw.
Imam (Ayatollah) Musa Sadr’s mysterious disappearance in Libya - his body was never found- opened the way for Khomeini to invade Iran, which accurately describes the action of a foreigner like Khomeini taking over a country in which he (Khomeini) was neither born nor had any Persian blood in his veins at all, paternally or maternally.
Imam (Ayatollah) Musa Sadr’s mysterious disappearance in Libya - his body was never found- opened the way for Khomeini to invade Iran, which accurately describes the action of a foreigner like Khomeini taking over a country in which he (Khomeini) was neither born nor had any Persian blood in his veins at all, paternally or maternally.
While
one devout Iranian in California speaks of Khomeini reverently as a
great man, similar to Hitler, other less friendly Persians liken him to
an invader like Genghis Khan the Mongol scourge.
The cornerstone and founder of the Islamic Revolution of Iran was Ayatollah Khomeini and the structure which he put in place. However, there is compelling evidence that Khomeini was never an Iranian in the first place and had no right to impose his policies on the Iranian people. Nor was his elevation to the title of ayatollah anything more than a political, face-saving expediency to prevent his being hanged for treason in 1964. Considerable effort was made in 1979 to eradicate evidence of any record of either Khomeini's non-Iranian origins and the source of his use of the title of Ayatollah.
The cornerstone and founder of the Islamic Revolution of Iran was Ayatollah Khomeini and the structure which he put in place. However, there is compelling evidence that Khomeini was never an Iranian in the first place and had no right to impose his policies on the Iranian people. Nor was his elevation to the title of ayatollah anything more than a political, face-saving expediency to prevent his being hanged for treason in 1964. Considerable effort was made in 1979 to eradicate evidence of any record of either Khomeini's non-Iranian origins and the source of his use of the title of Ayatollah.
One
of the first actions which Khomeini took, within hours of his return
to Iran after the Shah left, was to execute two prominent men who were
living proof of his origin and also of his false Ayatollah status. One
of these was Gen. Hassan Pakravan, Head of SAVAK, the Imperial Iranian
national intelligence and security organization.
Furthermore he immediately tried to assassinate the highly-respected
Ayatollah Shariatmadari, who, with Ayatollah Golpayegani, had in 1964
granted Khomeini the false title. They had agreed to allow Khomeini,
then literally awaiting death on charges of treason, to be called an
Ayatollah to save his life: it was forbidden to execute an Ayatollah.
This took place in 1964 at the urging of the British Ambassador to Iran
and Gen. Pakravan, when a face-saving legal reason had to be found not
to hang Khomeini for treason. It is known that Pakravan had fought
hard to avoid Khomeinis execution at that time.
Later, when the 1979 assassination attempt failed against Shariatmadari, Shariatmadari, far higher in the religious hierarchy than Khomeini, was placed, incommunicado and under house arrest, without the right to preach or receive visitors other than a handful of close relatives, whose anti-Khomeini statements could be easily impugned as biased.
Few contest that Khomeini’s mother was a Kashmiri Indian, but even fewer Iranians or otherwise know his fathers origins or his real name. The late Iranian Senator Moussavi, who represented Khuzestan Province in Southern Iran, at the time of the monarchy, knew Khomeini’s father and his four sons well, looked after their needs, used his influence to obtain their Iranian identity cards with fictitious dates and places of birth to avoid military service. Sen. Moussavi died for this help, on Khomeini's personal orders, immediately on Khomaini return from France after the 1979 coup.
SAVAK chief Gen. Pakravan, the man who saved Khomeini's life in 1964, was taken that same night onto the roof of his house and shot to death for having compiled a complete background file on Khomeini. The SAVAK background file still exists, as a senior SAVAK official, who defected and joined SAVAMA (the clerics equivalent of the SAVAK) took possession of it. This same man was reportedly head of SAVAMA in the US for quite some time, and sources indicate that he has kept the file for a rainy day.
Why did Khomeini return to Iran with such a bloodthirsty mind set? It seems clear that it was to exact the revenge which he said he would have. Prior to his return to Iran in 1979, Khomeini openly stated that he would kill as many Iranians. He considered everyone in Iran guilty in advance as there were hairs on the head of his son, killed in a car accident, but in his mind killed by Iranian authorities.
Unable to provide an acceptable paternal background for Khomeini, a story was concocted to link his paternal heritage to that of his Kashmiri Indian mother and introduced an Indian-born father (also from Kashmir) but of Iranian heritage. In fact, no such person existed. But someone with similar and misleading characteristics certainly did, which could lend credence to this fiction of an Indian father.
Khomeini’s real father, William Richard Williamson, was born in Bristol, England, in 1872 of British parents and lineage. This detail is based on first-hand evidence from a former Iranian employee of the Anglo- Iranian Oil Company (later known as British Petroleum- BP), who worked with and met the key players of this saga. This fact was supported by the lack of a denial in 1979 by Col. Archie Chisholm, a BP political officer and former editor at The Financial Times, when interviewed on the subject at his home in County Cork, Ireland, by a British newspaper.
The then-78-year old Chisholm stated: I knew Haji [as Williamson was later known] well; he worked for me. He certainly went native but whether he is Khomeini’s father I could not say. Would not an outright, ridiculing denial have been the natural response, were there no truth to the British paternity? From someone who knew Haji [and thus the truth] well?
Chisholm obviously wished to avoid a statement leading to political controversy or possible personal retribution in the very year Khomeini took over in Iran. Nor as a former, experienced political officer himself would he be willing to drag Britain into the new Middle East conflict. But neither was he prepared to provide an outright lie instead of his no comment.
How it all happened:
A stocky, handsome, dark-haired Bristol boy, Richard Williamson ran away to sea at the age of 13 as a cabin boy, on a ship bound for Australia. However, he jumped ship before he got there. Little is known about him until he showed up, at the age of 20, in Aden at the Southern end of the Arabian Peninsula in South Yemen, where he joined the local police force.
His good looks soon had Sultan Fazl bin-Ali, ruler of Lahej, persuading him to quit the police force to live with him. Richard later left him for another Sheikh, Yousef Ibrahim, a relative of the Al- Sabah family, which rules Kuwait today.
A few points should be remembered about the Persian Gulf and Arabian Peninsula area at that time. Regional countries like Lebanon, Iraq, Jordan, Syria, Saudi Arabia and so forth did not exist as sovereign entities and were artificially created about 70 years ago by the British and French governments when they partitioned the area. Iran, or Persia as it was called, was soon to be controlled by Russian Cossacks in the North and the British Army in the South, although technically it remained an independent monarchy under the largely absentee Qajar dynasty.
British military presence in Iran was under Lt.-Col. Sykes (later Sir Percy Sykes), based in Shiraz, but politically controlled by Sir Arnold Wilson in Khorramshahr (then called Mohammareh) with assistance from E. Elkington in Masjid-Suleiman and Dr. Young, based in Ahwaz. All three were cities in Khuzestan Province, which was later represented by Senator Moussavi. Col. T.E. Lawrence, who gained fame as Lawrence of Arabia, operated out of Basra in Mesopotamia (Iraq) and Khorramshahr during this same period.
Oilfields, far beyond the technological capability of the Arab tribes (or Persia) to develop or appreciate as a valuable commodity, were being discovered and exploited by the British, including via the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, formed to siphon off oil from Khuzestan Province in Southern Iran.
Kuwait, on the other side of the Persian Gulf was still not a country at the time. As the major player in the Middle East oil industry, Britain had to exert influence and control through its political and oil personnel. Haji Abdullah Williamson became one of these in 1924 when he joined British Petroleum as political officer. He retired under that same name in 1937, at the age of 65. Earlier, in what is now Kuwait, Richard Williamson had very quickly converted to Islam and adopted the first name of Abdullah. Family names were still unusual and son of the son of or son of a type of worker or craftsman was still commonly used to identify people. For 14 years he had lived among the Bedouin tribes on the Arabian Peninsula and in 1895 and 1898 he went on pilgrimages to Mecca, took on the rightful title of Haji and took on his first benefactors name of Fazl, adding Zobeiri to it as a distinguisher. Thus, William Richard Williamson became known as Haji Abdullah Fazl Zobeiri.
During his service with British Petroleum in the Persian Gulf, Haji Abdullah took his vacations in Indian Kashmir, to rest from the relentless Gulf heat and in this timeframe married at least seven times to Arab and Indian women each under Muslim marriage rituals. He had 13 children of whom seven were boys and the rest girls with most of the children dying in early childhood. His repeated Kashmir excursions and Indian wives and use of the name Abdullah Fazl Zobeiri probably give rise to the Kashmir Indian father misconception.
With dark-haired Haji Abdullah a fanatically devout Muslim, a characteristic he imposed on his children, this fervent religious attitude and Arab nomenclature would not normally be an expected combination for a foreigner, especially an Englishman. He insisted his four surviving sons attend religious school in Najaf (in Iraq) under the tutelage of Ayatollahs Yazdi (meaning of the city of Yazd) and Shirazi (of the city of Shiraz). Two of them, Hindizadeh (meaning Indian born) and Passandideh (meaning pleasing or approved) studied well and eventually became ayatollahs in their own right.
The third boy, a troublesome young man, failed to make his mark in Najaf and went to the Iranian holy city of Qom, where he studied under Ayatollah Boroujerdi. When family names became a requirement by law under His Majesty Reza Shah, the young man chose the city of his residence, Khomein, as the designator and took on the name Khomeini (meaning: “from Khomein city”).
The fourth son hated theology and went across the Persian Gulf to Kuwait and opened up two gas (petrol) stations using the paternal family name of Haji Ali Williamson, though it is unclear if he ever performed the Haj pilgrimage. This in itself links Khomeini through that brother with Haji Williamson. Why, otherwise, would Rouhallah Khomeinis undisputed brother use the Williamson family name? The patriarch of this brood, Haji Abdullah Fazl Zobeiri (aka Haji Abdullah Williamson in BP), was thrown out of Iran by Reza Shah along with three other British political officers for anti-Iranian activity and joined his son in Kuwait. Here he took on the duties of Oil Distribution for the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company.
With his longstanding contacts in the Arab world and his Muslim religion, he forced a 50/50 agreement between US oil interests in Kuwait and the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company as well as in 1932 pursuing the exclusive exploration rights for British Petroleum in Abu Dhabi.
His lack of a formal education forced British Petroleum to send out Archie H. T. Chisholm (see above), a senior executive, to conclude the Abu Dhabi contract and together with Haji Abdullah’s political influence they overcame competition from Major Frank Holmes, Sheikh Hussein and Mohammad Yateen to successfully land the exclusive contract. Chisholm, as he said, got to know Khomeini’s father well. Back in Iran again in 1960, Khomeini saw an opportunity to exact revenge for his father having been thrown out of Iran and to impose his Islamic fundamentalist philosophy onto an Iran struggling with budget problems, caused mostly by its oil being in the control of foreign oil companies, which decided not Iran how much oil the country was allowed to produce and at what price it had to be sold.
With his own and his family's theological background, Khomeni began to foment an anti-monarchy revolt through the mosques, which by 1964 resulted in imposition of martial law and finally with his arrest and his being sentenced to death by hanging. And consequently he was given the life-saving Ayatollah title which he had not earned.
After formally being exiled to Turkey, Khomeini ended up in Iraq where he wrote some philosophical and social behavior dissertations which were so bizarre by religious standards that, where possible, the tracts were bought up and destroyed by the Iranian Government when he took over in 1979. The most damning were in Arabic language versions and then later, cleaner versions appeared as edited translations in Farsi.
Some linguists, who studied his public speeches in 1979 and 1980, concluded his Farsi vocabulary to be less than 200 words, so not only did he not have Persian blood, he did not even speak the language. With the number of Iranians who have died because of him and his successors over the past 25 years going into the hundreds of thousands, if not well over a million if the death toll from the eight-year Iran-Iraq war is included, this Anglo-Indian may have had no love or compassion for Iranians either.
In the Iran Air aircraft flying Khomeini back from France to Tehran in early 1979, with cameras rolling, a journalist asked: What do you feel about returning to Iran? He replied: Nothing! The question was repeated, and again he replied: Nothing!
Later, when the 1979 assassination attempt failed against Shariatmadari, Shariatmadari, far higher in the religious hierarchy than Khomeini, was placed, incommunicado and under house arrest, without the right to preach or receive visitors other than a handful of close relatives, whose anti-Khomeini statements could be easily impugned as biased.
Few contest that Khomeini’s mother was a Kashmiri Indian, but even fewer Iranians or otherwise know his fathers origins or his real name. The late Iranian Senator Moussavi, who represented Khuzestan Province in Southern Iran, at the time of the monarchy, knew Khomeini’s father and his four sons well, looked after their needs, used his influence to obtain their Iranian identity cards with fictitious dates and places of birth to avoid military service. Sen. Moussavi died for this help, on Khomeini's personal orders, immediately on Khomaini return from France after the 1979 coup.
SAVAK chief Gen. Pakravan, the man who saved Khomeini's life in 1964, was taken that same night onto the roof of his house and shot to death for having compiled a complete background file on Khomeini. The SAVAK background file still exists, as a senior SAVAK official, who defected and joined SAVAMA (the clerics equivalent of the SAVAK) took possession of it. This same man was reportedly head of SAVAMA in the US for quite some time, and sources indicate that he has kept the file for a rainy day.
Why did Khomeini return to Iran with such a bloodthirsty mind set? It seems clear that it was to exact the revenge which he said he would have. Prior to his return to Iran in 1979, Khomeini openly stated that he would kill as many Iranians. He considered everyone in Iran guilty in advance as there were hairs on the head of his son, killed in a car accident, but in his mind killed by Iranian authorities.
Unable to provide an acceptable paternal background for Khomeini, a story was concocted to link his paternal heritage to that of his Kashmiri Indian mother and introduced an Indian-born father (also from Kashmir) but of Iranian heritage. In fact, no such person existed. But someone with similar and misleading characteristics certainly did, which could lend credence to this fiction of an Indian father.
Khomeini’s real father, William Richard Williamson, was born in Bristol, England, in 1872 of British parents and lineage. This detail is based on first-hand evidence from a former Iranian employee of the Anglo- Iranian Oil Company (later known as British Petroleum- BP), who worked with and met the key players of this saga. This fact was supported by the lack of a denial in 1979 by Col. Archie Chisholm, a BP political officer and former editor at The Financial Times, when interviewed on the subject at his home in County Cork, Ireland, by a British newspaper.
The then-78-year old Chisholm stated: I knew Haji [as Williamson was later known] well; he worked for me. He certainly went native but whether he is Khomeini’s father I could not say. Would not an outright, ridiculing denial have been the natural response, were there no truth to the British paternity? From someone who knew Haji [and thus the truth] well?
Chisholm obviously wished to avoid a statement leading to political controversy or possible personal retribution in the very year Khomeini took over in Iran. Nor as a former, experienced political officer himself would he be willing to drag Britain into the new Middle East conflict. But neither was he prepared to provide an outright lie instead of his no comment.
How it all happened:
A stocky, handsome, dark-haired Bristol boy, Richard Williamson ran away to sea at the age of 13 as a cabin boy, on a ship bound for Australia. However, he jumped ship before he got there. Little is known about him until he showed up, at the age of 20, in Aden at the Southern end of the Arabian Peninsula in South Yemen, where he joined the local police force.
His good looks soon had Sultan Fazl bin-Ali, ruler of Lahej, persuading him to quit the police force to live with him. Richard later left him for another Sheikh, Yousef Ibrahim, a relative of the Al- Sabah family, which rules Kuwait today.
A few points should be remembered about the Persian Gulf and Arabian Peninsula area at that time. Regional countries like Lebanon, Iraq, Jordan, Syria, Saudi Arabia and so forth did not exist as sovereign entities and were artificially created about 70 years ago by the British and French governments when they partitioned the area. Iran, or Persia as it was called, was soon to be controlled by Russian Cossacks in the North and the British Army in the South, although technically it remained an independent monarchy under the largely absentee Qajar dynasty.
British military presence in Iran was under Lt.-Col. Sykes (later Sir Percy Sykes), based in Shiraz, but politically controlled by Sir Arnold Wilson in Khorramshahr (then called Mohammareh) with assistance from E. Elkington in Masjid-Suleiman and Dr. Young, based in Ahwaz. All three were cities in Khuzestan Province, which was later represented by Senator Moussavi. Col. T.E. Lawrence, who gained fame as Lawrence of Arabia, operated out of Basra in Mesopotamia (Iraq) and Khorramshahr during this same period.
Oilfields, far beyond the technological capability of the Arab tribes (or Persia) to develop or appreciate as a valuable commodity, were being discovered and exploited by the British, including via the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, formed to siphon off oil from Khuzestan Province in Southern Iran.
Kuwait, on the other side of the Persian Gulf was still not a country at the time. As the major player in the Middle East oil industry, Britain had to exert influence and control through its political and oil personnel. Haji Abdullah Williamson became one of these in 1924 when he joined British Petroleum as political officer. He retired under that same name in 1937, at the age of 65. Earlier, in what is now Kuwait, Richard Williamson had very quickly converted to Islam and adopted the first name of Abdullah. Family names were still unusual and son of the son of or son of a type of worker or craftsman was still commonly used to identify people. For 14 years he had lived among the Bedouin tribes on the Arabian Peninsula and in 1895 and 1898 he went on pilgrimages to Mecca, took on the rightful title of Haji and took on his first benefactors name of Fazl, adding Zobeiri to it as a distinguisher. Thus, William Richard Williamson became known as Haji Abdullah Fazl Zobeiri.
During his service with British Petroleum in the Persian Gulf, Haji Abdullah took his vacations in Indian Kashmir, to rest from the relentless Gulf heat and in this timeframe married at least seven times to Arab and Indian women each under Muslim marriage rituals. He had 13 children of whom seven were boys and the rest girls with most of the children dying in early childhood. His repeated Kashmir excursions and Indian wives and use of the name Abdullah Fazl Zobeiri probably give rise to the Kashmir Indian father misconception.
With dark-haired Haji Abdullah a fanatically devout Muslim, a characteristic he imposed on his children, this fervent religious attitude and Arab nomenclature would not normally be an expected combination for a foreigner, especially an Englishman. He insisted his four surviving sons attend religious school in Najaf (in Iraq) under the tutelage of Ayatollahs Yazdi (meaning of the city of Yazd) and Shirazi (of the city of Shiraz). Two of them, Hindizadeh (meaning Indian born) and Passandideh (meaning pleasing or approved) studied well and eventually became ayatollahs in their own right.
The third boy, a troublesome young man, failed to make his mark in Najaf and went to the Iranian holy city of Qom, where he studied under Ayatollah Boroujerdi. When family names became a requirement by law under His Majesty Reza Shah, the young man chose the city of his residence, Khomein, as the designator and took on the name Khomeini (meaning: “from Khomein city”).
The fourth son hated theology and went across the Persian Gulf to Kuwait and opened up two gas (petrol) stations using the paternal family name of Haji Ali Williamson, though it is unclear if he ever performed the Haj pilgrimage. This in itself links Khomeini through that brother with Haji Williamson. Why, otherwise, would Rouhallah Khomeinis undisputed brother use the Williamson family name? The patriarch of this brood, Haji Abdullah Fazl Zobeiri (aka Haji Abdullah Williamson in BP), was thrown out of Iran by Reza Shah along with three other British political officers for anti-Iranian activity and joined his son in Kuwait. Here he took on the duties of Oil Distribution for the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company.
With his longstanding contacts in the Arab world and his Muslim religion, he forced a 50/50 agreement between US oil interests in Kuwait and the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company as well as in 1932 pursuing the exclusive exploration rights for British Petroleum in Abu Dhabi.
His lack of a formal education forced British Petroleum to send out Archie H. T. Chisholm (see above), a senior executive, to conclude the Abu Dhabi contract and together with Haji Abdullah’s political influence they overcame competition from Major Frank Holmes, Sheikh Hussein and Mohammad Yateen to successfully land the exclusive contract. Chisholm, as he said, got to know Khomeini’s father well. Back in Iran again in 1960, Khomeini saw an opportunity to exact revenge for his father having been thrown out of Iran and to impose his Islamic fundamentalist philosophy onto an Iran struggling with budget problems, caused mostly by its oil being in the control of foreign oil companies, which decided not Iran how much oil the country was allowed to produce and at what price it had to be sold.
With his own and his family's theological background, Khomeni began to foment an anti-monarchy revolt through the mosques, which by 1964 resulted in imposition of martial law and finally with his arrest and his being sentenced to death by hanging. And consequently he was given the life-saving Ayatollah title which he had not earned.
After formally being exiled to Turkey, Khomeini ended up in Iraq where he wrote some philosophical and social behavior dissertations which were so bizarre by religious standards that, where possible, the tracts were bought up and destroyed by the Iranian Government when he took over in 1979. The most damning were in Arabic language versions and then later, cleaner versions appeared as edited translations in Farsi.
Some linguists, who studied his public speeches in 1979 and 1980, concluded his Farsi vocabulary to be less than 200 words, so not only did he not have Persian blood, he did not even speak the language. With the number of Iranians who have died because of him and his successors over the past 25 years going into the hundreds of thousands, if not well over a million if the death toll from the eight-year Iran-Iraq war is included, this Anglo-Indian may have had no love or compassion for Iranians either.
In the Iran Air aircraft flying Khomeini back from France to Tehran in early 1979, with cameras rolling, a journalist asked: What do you feel about returning to Iran? He replied: Nothing! The question was repeated, and again he replied: Nothing!
Summary of Khomeini's Background
1.
In 1964 Ayatollah Shariatmadari and Ayatollah Golpayegani gave
Khomeini the title of Ayatollah. Reportedly, they had done this to save
Khomeini's life, as Khomeini was facing a charge of treason against
the Shah. And reportedly it was the UK ambassador who had urged that
Khomeini be saved.
2. Shariatmadari was higher in the religious hierarchy than Khomeini. In 1979, after Khomeini took over Iran, he placed Shariatmadari under house arrest.
3. Reportedly, Khomeini was not Iranian. He "was neither born (in Iran) nor had any Persian blood in his veins at all, paternally or maternally." Khomeini's mother was a Kashmiri Indian. Reportedly, a story was invented that Khomeini had a Kashmiri Indian father with Iranian origins. The Iranian Senator Moussavi knew Khomeini's real father. Reportedly Khomeini had Moussavi killed.
4. Reportedly, Khomeini's real father, was William Richard Williamson, born in Bristol, England, in 1872 of British parents and lineage. A witness to this was a former Iranian employee of the Anglo- Iranian Oil Company (later BP), who knew the Khomeini family. In 1979, when Col. Archie Chisholm, a BP political officer and former editor at The Financial Times, was asked about this, he neither confirmed nor denied the story.
William Richard Williamson's biography was written in the early 1950s, by Stanton Hope, a British Journalist and writer who had met Williamson in his home near Basra in the late 1940s. The book title is: Arabian Adventurer: the Story of Haji Williamson
5. Reportedly, Richard Williamson, at the age of 20, was working in South Yemen in the local police force.
"His good looks soon had Sultan Fazl bin-Ali, ruler of Lahej, persuading him to quit the police force to live with him. Richard later left him for another Sheikh, Yousef Ibrahim, a relative of the Al- Sabah family, which rules Kuwait today."
6. In Iran at this time, the British were exploiting the oilfields. Williamson, now a Muslim, joined British Petroleum as political officer. He called himself Haji Abdullah Fazl Zobeiri.
7. Williamson took holidays in Kashmir and married at least seven times to Arab and Indian women. His sons attended religious schools. Reportedly, one son went to the Iranian holy city of Qom and took the name Khomeini.
8. In the early 1960s, Khomeini began to plot against the Shah. In 1964 Khomeini was sentenced to death. By becoming an Ayatollah, his life was saved.
9. Reportedly, in 1979, Khomeini was flown from France to Iran, with the help of the British Intelligence Service, MI6. He took over Iran.
In 1979, Imam (Ayatollah) Mussa Sadr disappeared during a visit to Libya. Imam Mussa Sadr was the Iranian-born leader of the Lebanese Shia and he "was revered and respected above all others in the Shia world."
2. Shariatmadari was higher in the religious hierarchy than Khomeini. In 1979, after Khomeini took over Iran, he placed Shariatmadari under house arrest.
3. Reportedly, Khomeini was not Iranian. He "was neither born (in Iran) nor had any Persian blood in his veins at all, paternally or maternally." Khomeini's mother was a Kashmiri Indian. Reportedly, a story was invented that Khomeini had a Kashmiri Indian father with Iranian origins. The Iranian Senator Moussavi knew Khomeini's real father. Reportedly Khomeini had Moussavi killed.
4. Reportedly, Khomeini's real father, was William Richard Williamson, born in Bristol, England, in 1872 of British parents and lineage. A witness to this was a former Iranian employee of the Anglo- Iranian Oil Company (later BP), who knew the Khomeini family. In 1979, when Col. Archie Chisholm, a BP political officer and former editor at The Financial Times, was asked about this, he neither confirmed nor denied the story.
William Richard Williamson's biography was written in the early 1950s, by Stanton Hope, a British Journalist and writer who had met Williamson in his home near Basra in the late 1940s. The book title is: Arabian Adventurer: the Story of Haji Williamson
5. Reportedly, Richard Williamson, at the age of 20, was working in South Yemen in the local police force.
"His good looks soon had Sultan Fazl bin-Ali, ruler of Lahej, persuading him to quit the police force to live with him. Richard later left him for another Sheikh, Yousef Ibrahim, a relative of the Al- Sabah family, which rules Kuwait today."
6. In Iran at this time, the British were exploiting the oilfields. Williamson, now a Muslim, joined British Petroleum as political officer. He called himself Haji Abdullah Fazl Zobeiri.
7. Williamson took holidays in Kashmir and married at least seven times to Arab and Indian women. His sons attended religious schools. Reportedly, one son went to the Iranian holy city of Qom and took the name Khomeini.
8. In the early 1960s, Khomeini began to plot against the Shah. In 1964 Khomeini was sentenced to death. By becoming an Ayatollah, his life was saved.
9. Reportedly, in 1979, Khomeini was flown from France to Iran, with the help of the British Intelligence Service, MI6. He took over Iran.
In 1979, Imam (Ayatollah) Mussa Sadr disappeared during a visit to Libya. Imam Mussa Sadr was the Iranian-born leader of the Lebanese Shia and he "was revered and respected above all others in the Shia world."
Why was the Shah of Iran toppled by the CIA and MI6?
The mainstream media would like us to believe that the Shah was overthrown by People Power and that the CIA and MI6 were taken by surprise. However, there is evidence that the CIA and MI6 toppled the Shah because he had become too much of a nationalist, like Egypt’s President Jamal Abdul-Naser, and was not following instructions on oil or even opium.
The CIA did not want left-wing democrats taking over from the Shah as they might not be easy to control. So, reportedly, the CIA allowed the Ayatollahs to take over.
Radio Free Iran claimed that while at Qom, the Ayatollah Khomeini received a "monthly stipend from the British, and he is in constant contact with his masters, the British."
On 19 January 1980, the International Herald Tribune reported that the Shah had said, two years before he was overthrown, that he had heard from two different sources connected with oil companies that the regime in Iran would change.
‘We believe that there was a plan to ensure less oil was offered to the world markets in order to bring down the price (of oil). One country was to be chosen for the sacrifice... It seems that the country chosen to drop its oil production was mine’ said the Shah.
The mainstream media would like us to believe that the Shah was overthrown by People Power and that the CIA and MI6 were taken by surprise. However, there is evidence that the CIA and MI6 toppled the Shah because he had become too much of a nationalist, like Egypt’s President Jamal Abdul-Naser, and was not following instructions on oil or even opium.
The CIA did not want left-wing democrats taking over from the Shah as they might not be easy to control. So, reportedly, the CIA allowed the Ayatollahs to take over.
Radio Free Iran claimed that while at Qom, the Ayatollah Khomeini received a "monthly stipend from the British, and he is in constant contact with his masters, the British."
On 19 January 1980, the International Herald Tribune reported that the Shah had said, two years before he was overthrown, that he had heard from two different sources connected with oil companies that the regime in Iran would change.
‘We believe that there was a plan to ensure less oil was offered to the world markets in order to bring down the price (of oil). One country was to be chosen for the sacrifice... It seems that the country chosen to drop its oil production was mine’ said the Shah.
According to the Guardian: “Shah- Oil Companies Helped to Oust Him”
The Shah's nationalist policies were making him more popular in Iran and making his country more independent and more powerful. This worried the CIA and MI6.
1. The Shah bought land from the upper classes and, along with the crown's own land, sold it back cheaply to tenant farmers. Over one and a half million people became land owners, thus ending the old feudal system.
2. The Shah allowed women the right to vote. He brought an end to the wearing of the veil.
3. He developed plans for a $90 billion nuclear power program.
4. The Shah signed petroleum agreements with ENI, the Italian oil company.
5. He began to close down the opium industry. This had been created during the days of British influence.
Former intelligence officer, Dr John Coleman, considers opium to be of prime importance in the toppling of the Shah (Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300 - 6). Dr Coleman is sometimes described as being a conspiracy theorist.
Coleman believes that the U.S. government toppled the Shah of Iran. He writes:
Why was the Shah deposed...?
In a word, because of DRUGS. The Shah had clamped down and virtually put an end to the immensely lucrative opium trade being conducted out of Iran by the British. At the time that the Shah took over in Iran, there were already one million opium/heroin addicts.
This the British would not tolerate, so they sent the United States to do their dirty work for them in terms of the “special relationship” between the two countries.
When Khomeini took over the U.S. Embassy in Teheran, arms sales by the United States, which had begun with the Shah, were not discontinued...
After 1984, Khomeini’s liberal attitude toward opium had increased the number of addicts to 2 million, according to United Nations and World Health Organization statistics.
Both President Carter and his successor, Ronald Reagan, willingly and with full knowledge of what was at stake, went on supplying arms to Iran even while American hostages languished in captivity...
The arms trade with Iran was sealed at a meeting between Cyrus Vance... and Dr. Hashemi, which resulted in the U.S. Air Force beginning an immediate airlift of arms to Iran, carried on even at the height of the hostage crisis the arms came from U.S. Army stockpiles in Germany and some were even flown directly from the United States with re-fuelling stops at the Azores.
The Shah's nationalist policies were making him more popular in Iran and making his country more independent and more powerful. This worried the CIA and MI6.
1. The Shah bought land from the upper classes and, along with the crown's own land, sold it back cheaply to tenant farmers. Over one and a half million people became land owners, thus ending the old feudal system.
2. The Shah allowed women the right to vote. He brought an end to the wearing of the veil.
3. He developed plans for a $90 billion nuclear power program.
4. The Shah signed petroleum agreements with ENI, the Italian oil company.
5. He began to close down the opium industry. This had been created during the days of British influence.
Former intelligence officer, Dr John Coleman, considers opium to be of prime importance in the toppling of the Shah (Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300 - 6). Dr Coleman is sometimes described as being a conspiracy theorist.
Coleman believes that the U.S. government toppled the Shah of Iran. He writes:
Why was the Shah deposed...?
In a word, because of DRUGS. The Shah had clamped down and virtually put an end to the immensely lucrative opium trade being conducted out of Iran by the British. At the time that the Shah took over in Iran, there were already one million opium/heroin addicts.
This the British would not tolerate, so they sent the United States to do their dirty work for them in terms of the “special relationship” between the two countries.
When Khomeini took over the U.S. Embassy in Teheran, arms sales by the United States, which had begun with the Shah, were not discontinued...
After 1984, Khomeini’s liberal attitude toward opium had increased the number of addicts to 2 million, according to United Nations and World Health Organization statistics.
Both President Carter and his successor, Ronald Reagan, willingly and with full knowledge of what was at stake, went on supplying arms to Iran even while American hostages languished in captivity...
The arms trade with Iran was sealed at a meeting between Cyrus Vance... and Dr. Hashemi, which resulted in the U.S. Air Force beginning an immediate airlift of arms to Iran, carried on even at the height of the hostage crisis the arms came from U.S. Army stockpiles in Germany and some were even flown directly from the United States with re-fuelling stops at the Azores.
This is The Real Story of Khomaini which the Iranian Regime hides from whole world.
AMUKANMelayu - Kita orang Melayu anakku, Islam tu diletakkan di atas sekali. Islam di JUNJUNG, adat di kilik.............