BLOG DR MAHATHIR DISEKAT gara2 MH370
[Admin] Artikel mengenai MH370 yang ditulis Dr Mahathir semalam. Ini terjemahan dalam bahasa Melayu.
Blog rasmi Tun Dr Mahathir -chedet . cc tidak dapat diakses buat masa
ini. Kami sedang berusaha untuk mengenalpasti punca masalah.
MH 370.
1. I am very upset over MAS employees being held hostage in Beijing by
the relatives of the passengers of MH 370. I am upset because they are
blaming the wrong people. The loss of the plane is due to the makers
Boeing.
2. How can Boeing produce a plane that is so easily disabled? Normally
it is entirely possible for the crew, the pilots and co-pilots to
communicate even with KLIA. Maybe the captain did not want to. But
surely the co-pilot would want to inform ground stations that the plane
was not flying according to the scheduled route.
3. The passengers may not notice but the co-pilot would. So would the
cabin crew. They are all trained to deal with emergencies if not
immediately, at least later.
4. But none of them seemed to have tried. It must be because the whole
communication system has been disabled. It must take some effort if the
pilot tried to disable the system. The co-pilot would notice and for his
own life he would have tried to do something. Was he disabled? Were all
the crew members and the passengers disabled?
5. The flight of all passenger planes can be tracked even on a personal
mobile phone. I can do it on my phone. If the plane landed I can watch
it landing and taxiing. I can even get information on any plane anywhere
– what make and model, who it belongs to and where it is flying from
and its destination.
6. I believe there are equipments on the plane which allows it to be tracked – probably by Global Positioning System.
7. Sophisticated cameras on the spy-satellites operated by some
countries can actually photograph a man on the ground and even identify
him. Surely the cameras can see and photograph a 63-metre aircraft.
8. But the aircraft disappeared completely. I think on everyone’s mobile
it has disappeared. Some equipment on the aircraft must have been
disabled. Even the backup must have been disabled
9. Boeing built this aircraft. Boeing must explain how all these means
of tracking the plane can be disabled, can fail. Either Boeing
technology is poor or it is not fail-safe. I would not like to fly in
Boeing aircraft unless Boeing can explain how all its system can fail or
be disabled.
10. Remote control technology is now very sophisticated and powerful. Is
it true that Boeing has installed remote control equipment on the
aircraft to prevent hijacking? If it did why did it not direct the
aircraft to land safely? Is it possible for third parties to take
control of the aircraft remotely?
11. When a plane crashes on land or sea there would be debris or oil
slick. None has been found so far. Can it be that the plane remained
intact on crashing and sank with no trace and no one launching the
lifeboat doors as we are told all these aircrafts are equipped with?
12. Can one believe this plane quietly floated down into the raging sea
and sank conveniently in the deepest part (7miles deep) of the Indian
Ocean?
13. It is standard practice that when a plane crashes, a team of experts
would arrive at the scene soonest so as to find the cause of the crash.
Boeing and the authorities in the manufacturing country should be
looking out for the plane. Maybe the plane type should be grounded. But
Boeing has shown no interest and had said practically nothing.
14. MAS has been flying numerous kinds of aircrafts and has a good
record. The pilots are well-trained. Even if the pilot wants to commit
suicide the co-pilot and the cabin crew would not allow him to do so
without trying something. But no one, not even the passengers did
anything. Maybe it is because they have been somehow incapacitated.
15. Boeing must answer all these questions. Boeing must demonstrate
possible ways for the communications system to be disabled. Boeing must
accept responsibility for building an aircraft that can disappear in
mid-air so completely.
16. MAS is not at fault, lax security or not. MAS flew a plane fully
expecting it to perform the task. But the plane has somehow behaved
differently. Who is responsible? Not MAS but certainly the makers of the
plane – Boeing Aircraft Corporation.
