,مليسيا دان اسلام بوکن ميليک اورڠ ڤوليتيک
, مک ڤرجواڠن اݢام تتڤ دڤرجواڠکن اوليه اومت اسلام دري بيدڠ يڠ لاءين
سام اد كامي منڠ اتاو كامي ماتي

PERJALAN HAJI AKI


Thursday, 18 April 2013

PERHIMPUNAN "BERSIH" BOLEH DUDUK DAN BANTAH SELAMANA MEREKA SUKA


BERSIH - Jika buat kecuh....ambil di rumah.....


 
KEJAM - Kekejaman yang melampau di lakukan kepada Anggota Keselamatan
Berkali-kali kami cakap bahawa Bersih akan buat kecuh masa pilihanraya dan khsusnya pada masa pembuangan undi.

Sampai Utusan Malaysia pun quote kita. Naik ranking skit ... hheheheh

Semalam sudah keluar satu arahan telah dikeluarkan oleh BERSIH PRU 13 meminta org ramai turun ke kemuncak himpunan kebangkitan rakyat pada hari penamaan calon menyokong calon pakatan rakyat beramai ramai di seluruh malaysia.

Peminat dan Penyokong yang sudah tak mampu berfikir diminta memakai baju mengikut kod :-

 
1. Kuning utk bersih  - Himpunan Campuran (Majoriti PAS/PKR)
 
 2. Hijau untuk Anti Lynas  - Himpunan Cina

 
3. Merah R untuk Royalti - Himpunan Islamelayu Kelantan sahaja

 4. Oren untuk Felda - Himpunan Islamelayu FELDA(Ini muka Felda ke?)


5. SPENDAR PUTIH - Himpunan Orang yang GILA SEX

Ini semua pemula.

Rocky Bru SINI laporkan Tunku Aziz dedahkan ianya dah dilancarkan dari tahun lepas:

"We have seen an internal PKR document dated Dec 15, 2012, which lists out various steps to create chaos and dissatisfaction against the Elections Commission on polling day by raising repeated protests at the polling station so as to cause the other voters waiting in the queue to be unhappy and dissatisfied with the EC." - Tunku Aziz, former Transparency International (Malaysia)


Surat Arahan Sulit PKR tersebar?


Menurut macai UMNO yang menyebarkan dokumen ini, ini adalah arahan sulit yang telah dikeluarkan oleh Parti Keadilan Rakyat khusus bagi menghadapi pilihanraya ke 13 ini..

Dalam arahan berikut ahli-ahli PKR pada peringkat pertama dikehendaki untuk wujudkan kekecohan di pusat mengundi supaya 'crowd' berasa kurang senang dan kecewa dengan kelemahan pengurusan Pusat Mengundi.

Manakala pada peringkat kedua pula on line media akan melaksanakan tugas selanjutnya iaitu menimbulkan rasa marah bermula pukul 1.00 tengahari..

Kononnya menurut surat arahan yang diminta sebarkan oleh macai UMNO ini, sepuluh Kawasan Parlimen yang pelu ditimbulkan kekecohan.

Kawasan tersebut ialah Gombak, Lembah Pantai, Permatang Pauh, Setiawangsa, Wangsa Maju, Bagan Serai, Bukit Katil, Muar, Pandan dan Sabak Bernam..


Hmmm... Aku ialah AJK Cabang Permatang Pauh (P044), jawatan.... tak payah sebutlah..

Oleh kerana Permatang Pauh juga turut tersenarai dalam Kawasan Parlimen yang perlu ditimbulkan kekecohan seperti surat yang macai UMNO sebarkan itu, sepatutnya aku dah dapat surat arahan itu..

Tapi malangnya hingga ke hari ini, biarpun kami bermesyuarat pada setiap bulan dengan di Pengerusikan oleh samada Presiden PKR sendiri iaitu Datuk Seri Wan Azizah ataupun Timbalan Ketua Menteri Pulau Pinang, Datuk Mansor Othman hingga sekarang aku tak pernah terima arahan seperti yang didakwa oleh macai UMNO itu..

Timbulkan kekecohan di Permatang Pauh itu adalah arahan paling bodoh yang aku nampak dari surat yang disebarkan oleh macai UMNO itu..

Sebabnya kami yakin kami akan menang.. jadi untuk apa ditimbulkan kekecohan??

Dan aku juga setuju dengan saranan UmnoWorld buat macai UMNO itu.. kalau surat itu bukan rekaannya sendiri sila laporkan kepada pihak Polis...

Jika tidak.. kita anggaplah surat tersebut hanyalah fitnah semata-mata yang disebarkan oleh seorang badut bagi menghiburkan kita semua..

Surat tersebut telah ditemui di SINI 

A May 5 Chaos?/Vote 4 Harmony

Post-Sunday election Venezuela: Malaysians don't need this on May 5
"We have seen an internal PKR document dated Dec 15, 2012, which lists out various steps to create chaos and dissatisfaction against the Elections Commission on polling day by raising repeated protests at the polling station so as to cause the other voters waiting in the queue to be unhappy and dissatisfied with the EC." - Tunku Aziz, former Transparency International (Malaysia)

Tunku was NOT ok with
Bersih 3.0 and he said so
If this was a statement made by some half-past-six punk, I'd ignore it. But this is Tunku Aziz, the gentleman the DAP called the "towering Malay" when he belonged to the party and to Pakatan Rakyat. [Leaked emails show Zionist group did work for PKR, April 17]. 

Add this to the threat of "peaceful intimidation" against "foreigners with Mykad" by the hate groupie Abutohs [ABU's Anything But Understandable, Apr 18], people have a basis to be quite concerned. I don't know how but the police and the security forces are doing about it but I know they have they have the responsibility to ensure that the these alleged or potential threats on the welfare of the people are not carried out on May 5 when we go to the polls.   


p.s. Another wise man who got a lot wiser after a political brief stint with Anwar Ibrahim is Dr Chandra Muzaffar. His latest piece is entitled Vote for Harmony and fits in well with this peace-loving posting. 










VOTING FOR HARMONY By Dr Chandra Muzaffar


It is a truism that the survival and success of our nation depends upon our ability to sustain and enhance our inter-ethnic harmony. This is why the question of how the BarisanNasional (BN) or the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) will manage ethnic relations in the country in the coming years is of critical importance to the voter in the 5 May General Election.

For a society whose multi-religious and multi-cultural texture is one of the most complex in the world, Malaysia has done remarkably well in preserving a degree of inter-ethnic harmony which is the envy of the rest of the human family.  An objective criterion testifies to this. Over 55 years there has been a minimum of communal violence. There has been only one major riot with communal overtones that resulted in the loss of lives. That the riot of 13 May 1969 was contained within a specific city, that law and order was restored within weeks and democratic rule reinstated in 21 months, is incontrovertible proof of the Government’s ability to dealwith an ethnic challenge.

The BN government and its predecessor, the Alliance, have proven their credentials in a number of other less significant fracases. The 1967 disturbance in Penang; the 1978 Kerling incident; and the 2001 Kampong Medan episode would be some examples. The BN has also defused ethnic tensions arising from certain issues such as the 1978 Merdeka University controversy, and the 2010 sporadic attacks on churches, mosques and a gurudawarain the wake of a Court decision on the use of the term ‘Allah’. Culprits responsible for the one cow head and five pig head incidents in recent years have also been punished by the law.

It is an irrefutable fact that the BN has the experience and the expertise in dealing with ethnic challenges. The PR has yet to be tested largely because when ethnic issues impinge upon security, they come within the purview of the Federal Government. Its management of four state governments has not equipped the PR with the skills and knowledge to negotiate the complex multi-ethnic terrain that is Malaysia.

PR supporters sometimes point to the inter-ethnic harmony in Kelantan as proof of its ability to maintain good relations among the different communities. Inter-harmony in Kelantan has very little to do with the Pas led government per se. Even when the BN was in power in Kota Baru from 1978 to 1990, relations between the majority Malay community and the Chinese and Siamese minorities were amicable. Kelantan has a long and distinguished record of inter-ethnic conviviality which goes beyond parties and politics. The small size of the minorities--- 5% of the population --- and their readiness to integrate into the larger Malay cultural ethos, the accommodative attitude of the majority, and an indigenous structure of governance which was not totally subverted by colonial rule, have all contributed to this.

In fact, current trends seem to suggest that conviviality among the communities in Kelantan may be under some strain as a result of the politics represented by PAS and its partner, the DAP.  Some of the restrictions and controls imposed in the name of PAS’s notion of ‘Islamic morality’ are beginning to create a certain degree of uneasiness among younger non-Muslim Kelantanese. Similarly, the rise of Chinese ethnocentrism at the national level, fuelled to a large extent by the DAP, is seeping into the consciousness of a segment of Chinese youths in Kelantan, and separating them from the Malay majority.

This is the real danger of enthroning PAS and DAP in Putrajaya. If they rule Malaysia, their respective ideological orientations will widen even further the chasm that divides Malaysian communities. PAS’s superficial approach to Muslim identity reflected in its negative outlook on the rights and roles of women; the interaction between the sexes;and what constitutes wholesome entertainment,coupled with its obsession with prohibitions and punishments, will not only drive a wedge between Muslims and non-Muslims but also polarise Muslims themselves. The DAP, on the other hand, which is already alienated from the Malay majority because of some of its chauvinistic stances will trigger a backlash from the latter if it pursues policies on the economy or education motivated by its lopsided view of equality.

It is not just their individual policies that are inimical to national unity. The DAP is vehemently opposed to PAS’s Islamic state which remains the Islamic party’s real goal even as it continues to flip-flop over its ‘negarakebajikan’. The DAP’s mission of a ‘Malaysian Malaysia’ which in reality demonstrates very little empathy for the defining  attributes  of the land and its identity --- BahasaMelayu; Islam and the Malay Rulers --- is a quest which Pas rejectstotally though it has not been vocal about it since 2008. This huge gap that separates the two parties in the Pakatan defies resolution. The third partner in the PR, the PartiKeadilan Rakyat (PKR), has made no attempt to reconcile this ideological split between the two parties.  This is why the PR is, for all intents and purposes, an inchoate, disparate inter-party grouping which is utterly incapable of bringing the various Malaysian communities together.

Malaysians should ask themselves if it is wise to hand the reins of power to such a grouping especially at a time when religion is emerging as the fundamental fault-line in our society. This is a pertinent question to raise for while PAS remains wedded to a narrow identity based dogma, the DAP is increasingly becoming the conduit for strident Christian voices that are less than sensitive to the prevailing Muslim majority landscape.  How can any sane, sensible person expect these two parties to help forge unity in the years ahead?
Dr. Chandra Muzaffar is the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Yayasan 1Malaysia.
Petaling Jaya.
15 April 2013.


AMUKANMELAYU - Layak mengundi adalah 13 juta dan yang selalu buat kecoh ni sekitar 500,000 orang.....mereka ini tidak pernah mewakili MEJORITI. Tapi kenapa mereka begitu yakin untuk memerintah? Sapa nak jadi raayat depa?